Ron and Ginny: Ron was meant for Hermione and Ginny was meant for Harry so of course they couldn't die. Charlie and Bill: Harry was not very close to Charlie or Bill so it wouldn't make a big impact on him. Percy: Percy couldn't die he came back and rescue his family. Fred and George: Fred and George were pretty close to Harry and everybody knows that Fred was way funnier than George and Harry kind of new Fred better so of course, goodbye Fred we will always miss you.
Stupid AutoCorrect. Oh and I'm sorry if I got something wrong but I'm only Arthur lived, so Lupin had to die. Fortunately she decided against it, despite saying that his death would have meant a "neater ending" for the series. In a Dateline interview, she explained: "It was felt to be a possibility that the hero would die. That's what I was aiming for, that you really felt that anyone was up for grabs.
So he came back from war and he tried to build a better world I suppose, as corny as that sounds. Also, in keeping him alive she also avoided riots in the street, so it was probably for the best. Although Jo did quite a good job offing almost every parental figure that meant anything to Harry — including his actual parents, Dumbledore, Sirius Black and Remus Lupin — apparently no-one's parents were safe in the series at all.
She previously revealed that she wanted to kill off older characters so that Voldemort's actions hit home with the reader, explaining: "I wanted to kill parents I wanted there to be an echo of what happened to Harry just to show the absolute evil of what Voldemort's doing. Of course, JK Rowling didn't just give some characters reprieves, she also seriously regretted her decision to kill off several others, and her main regret of the series might just surprise you. According to the writer, if there was one death she could actually take back in the series and not just apologise for on Twitter , it would be the owner of the ice cream store in Diagon Alley who helps Harry with his homework, Florean Fortescue.
On Pottermore , Jo revealed that the very minor character was originally meant to have a much bigger role which she ended up rethinking, therefore his murder at the hands of the Death Eaters was pretty much completely pointless. She wrote: "I seemed to have him kidnapped and killed for no good reason.
He is not the first wizard whom Voldemort murdered because he knew too much or too little , but he is the only one I feel guilty about, because it was all my fault. That caught me by surprise. I was surprised that he died. At the same time, the ticket officer is coming around asking for tickets.
It was a lot to take when J. Rowling killed off beloved characters like Albus Dumbledore, but a bit too much when Fred Weasley, the affable jokester and twin, died in the Battle of Hogwarts. I mean, even J. Rowling regrets killing off Fred Weasley. All we see is his family standing around his body.
0コメント